top of page
Search

AI Won’t Replace Communicators. It Might Finally Protect Them.

Imagine a communications function where people have time to think again.

Where strategy isn’t something you squeeze in after your inbox clears. Where authenticity comes from having the energy to be authentic. Where technology absorbs the noise so humans can focus on meaning.


That’s the future AI makes possible.


The conversation about AI in communications usually circles the same anxieties: efficiency, authenticity, job security. But there’s a more useful story emerging—one that has less to do with replacement and more to do with relief.


AI isn’t entering a healthy system and disrupting it. It’s arriving at a moment when communications work has become heavier, faster, and more fragmented than the human brain was ever meant to manage alone.


Which means the real opportunity of AI isn’t what it can generate. It’s what it can take off our plates—so communicators can return to the work that actually requires human judgment: strategy, creativity, and connection.


The Sustainability Challenge Behind the Workflow Problem

Recent research paints a stark picture:

  • 64% of communications and marketing professionals experienced extreme stress or burnout in the past year.[1]

  • 60% report increased workload intensity year over year. [1]

  • Digital communication overload is now a major contributor to occupational burnout, with professionals spending roughly 20 hours per week in reactive communication tools. [2]

  • Meanwhile, 88% of organizations are now using AI in some form, [3] yet many communicators feel more overwhelmed—not less.


We’ve framed AI as a productivity tool. But what the profession actually needs is a pressure-release valve.


The Better Question

Instead of asking: “Will AI make communications better?”

We should be asking: “Can communications careers remain sustainable without it?”


Today’s expectations ask human beings to:

  • Produce more content

  • Faster

  • Across more platforms

  • With higher scrutiny

  • While maintaining strategic depth and emotional intelligence


That equation doesn’t scale. It collapses people first.


Why This Work Has Become So Demanding

This isn’t a resilience problem. It’s a systems problem.

Communications didn’t suddenly get harder. It quietly got heavier.


Here’s what changed:

  • Social media acceleration: Always-on platforms reward speed, volume, and emotional intensity. Relevance expires quickly. Silence looks like failure.

  • Channel multiplication: One message now lives across email, Slack, Teams, LinkedIn, Instagram, internal portals, executive notes, crisis updates, and media—with different tones, timing, and audiences.

  • The constant-output expectation: Algorithms and leadership both reward “more,” turning strategic communication into an ongoing production line.

  • Reactive operating culture: Alerts, mentions, trending topics, and internal pings create a world where response replaces reflection.

  • Compression of thinking time: Drafting and publishing accelerated, but strategic thinking didn’t. It just got squeezed.

  • Emotional labor at scale: Communicators manage fear, anger, morale, reputation, and trust—often invisibly and without recovery time.

  • Metrics without meaning: Dashboards measure reach and clicks, but rarely the cognitive and emotional load required to sustain them.


This isn’t weakness. It’s arithmetic.

Human attention has limits. Communications demand does not.

That gap is what AI can help close—if we use it to relieve pressure, not amplify it.


AI as Relief, Not Replacement

Burnout isn’t coming from the work that requires human judgment. It’s coming from the work that never needed it:

  • Rewriting boilerplate

  • Monitoring endless feeds

  • Formatting instead of thinking

  • Responding instantly because everything feels urgent


These tasks don’t create value. They consume attention.

AI’s most important contribution isn’t what it produces. It’s what it absorbs—so humans can think again.


What Early Results Suggest

Organizations using AI-driven communication and service tools report:

  • Up to 40% reductions in handling time [4]

  • 20–30% gains in productivity [4]

  • Increases in satisfaction and engagement [4]


What that really means is not “people work harder." It means people work with margin—with space to reason, decide, and design.


Research from Boston Consulting Group shows AI-forward organizations expect significantly stronger performance advantages by 2028.[5] But the advantage isn’t speed alone. It’s sustainability: retaining people who aren’t drowning under impossible cognitive loads.


The Mirror AI Is Holding Up

AI exposes something uncomfortable:

We’ve built communications operations on human endurance.


When machines handle routine tasks in seconds, it becomes obvious how much human intelligence has been spent on work that never required it. That realization is destabilizing for systems built on volume—but freeing for professionals built for judgment.


This isn’t a threat to the profession. It’s an intervention.


A Healthier Communications Model

Imagine a function where:

  • AI handles pattern recognition so humans focus on interpretation and judgment

  • Strategy becomes the core job, not an afterthought

  • Burnout becomes a tracked risk metric, not a badge of honor

  • Authenticity improves because people have the energy to be authentic


As Anthony Monks, Director of Public Relations at Influence Tech PR (ITPR) observes, AI can synthesize communication signals across channels to show what truly resonates and where trust strengthens or weakens [6]—giving leaders clearer insight without replacing human interpretation.


That’s not automation replacing judgment. That’s automation serving it.


The Bottom Line

Burnout isn’t a side effect. It’s the system reporting failure.

AI won’t save communications by making it faster. Speed created the crisis.

AI might save communications by making it human again—by removing the weight that keeps professionals from thinking, connecting, and shaping narratives that matter.


The biggest threat to our field isn’t artificial intelligence.

It’s unsustainable expectations placed on very real people running on empty.


Footnotes

[1] State of Us 2025 Report – Coleman Parkes (survey of 1,000 communications and marketing professionals) https://www.provokemedia.com/research/state-of-us-2025

[2] Brosix, Digital Communication Overload in the Workplace https://www.brosix.com/blog/digital-communication-overload

[5] Boston Consulting Group, Are You Generating Value from AI? The Widening Gap (2025) https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/are-you-generating-value-from-ai-the-widening-gap

[6] Influence Tech PR (ITPR), Anthony Monks, How to Create and Measure Impact in Internal Communication https://www.itpr.co.uk/blog/how-to-create-and-measure-impact-in-internal-communication

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page